top of page
A-Foundational - B-Basic - C-General - D-Pain - E-Conflict - F-Power - G-Structural - H-Love

You will find these principles organized into eight distinct types.

Foundational Principles lay the basis for anankelogy as a unique science. These create the foundation for the discipline study of need. As objective phenomena, many aspects of our needs can be examined by the scientific method.

Basic Principles ground aspects of your experience with needs in the science of anankelogy. These establish anankelogy as a unique social science.

General Principles add wisdom to experiencing needs anchored in the science of anankelogy. These provide insight into what this new profession of need-response can do that other professional fields cannot.

Pain Principles start applying anankelogy to be more "need-responsive" in our lives. These apply primarily at the personal human problem level.

Conflict Principles offer some insight for negotiating disputes you have with others. These apply primarily at the interpersonal human problem level.

Authority Principles apply anankelogy to the legitimacy of those in positions of influential power. These apply primarily at the power human problem level.

Law Principles apply anankelogy to the point of having laws and unwritten norms. These apply primarily at the structural human problem level.

Love Principles cap these need-focused concepts with mutual respect for each other's needs. These give context to all the other types as we function best when we support others to function their best. One word for such positive regard is love.

<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center"><strong>Which do you think is more likely?</strong></p>
<p class="font_7"><br></p>
<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center">Needs are too subjective for any scientific inquiry.</p>
<p class="font_7"><br></p>
<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_7"><br></p>
<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center">An aspect of needs exists outside of subjective experience, allowing for scientific inquiry.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy isolates that part of your needs which occurs outside of any subjective experience of them. You feel thirsty when your body requires more water, but that requirement for water occurs as an objective fact. You only subjectively feel thirsty after the objective fact of your body requiring more water.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Likewise, you feel lonely when requiring help from others to do things you objectively cannot do for yourself. If you cannot get anyone to help you climb out of hole, your ability to continue functioning as before objectively diminishes. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/b01-basic-principle"><strong>Needs come first</strong></a>. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/b02-basic-principle"><strong>Emotions follow to convey such needs</strong></a>. Once the need fully resolves, there’s <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/d01-pain-principle"><strong>no longer any cause for such emotion</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Every experienced need first emerges as an objective fact about your ability to function. Your body then reports such needs in your subjective experience of emotions. Your emotions suggest what you can quickly do to ease that need, if necessary. Often with little if any regard for the needs of others.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy distinguishes between <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/4-levels-of-experiencing-your-needs#viewer-6hjn4"><strong>core needs for functioning</strong></a> and what we do about such needs that we conventionally also label as needs. I may say I need a glass of water, but more accurately I need water that I prefer to be provided in a glass. Since I can get that water from a bottle or direct from a water fountain, anankelogy identifies these as preferences and not literally as needs. If there is any flexibility, you can "prefer" one thing over another and still objectively function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Your need for water is inflexible. How to get that water is flexible. So anankelogy speaks of “<strong>inflexible needs</strong>” to point to these <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/4-levels-of-experiencing-your-needs#viewer-3t3d8"><strong>core needs</strong></a>. Anankelogy appreciates <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/4-levels-of-experiencing-your-needs#viewer-dmf5t"><strong>resources</strong></a><strong> </strong>to resolve your core needs exist less flexibly that how we <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/4-levels-of-experiencing-your-needs#viewer-6d0mo"><strong>access</strong></a><strong> </strong>such resources. And who should access, <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/4-levels-of-experiencing-your-needs#viewer-43bud"><strong>you or somebody else</strong>,</a> exists far more flexibly.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">This helpful distinction allows the academic discipline of anankelogy to better understand our needs. We can now delay gratification. We can postpone the urge to ease our discomforting needs so we can better understand the full gamut of our experience of needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">We can now describe what is happening with a set of needs without rushing to insist what should be done about such needs. <strong>Need-response </strong>applies this discipline when challenging the privileged norm of relieving pain of unmet needs by enduring the discomfort it takes to resolve needs. Once resolved, the body no longer has cause to use pain to warn of a threat to functioning that no longer exists.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">As long as we assume all needs stem from subjective experience, we tend to link each need to our choices. If only we made better rational choices, we wouldn’t be in so much pain. Or do goes our assumptions.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">While volition plays a role, you never choose to be thirsty. You never choose to be hungry. Or to be lonely. Each of these starts not with some subjective experience from our choices, but from an objective change in your ability to function regardless of your choices.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Your choices can influence when you feel thirsty. But you will eventually require water to restore your body’s fluid equilibrium. You <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c04-general-principle"><strong>cannot choose</strong></a> to simply ignore your body’s demand for water and still be able to objectively function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">The more we suspend our reliance upon impersonal rules and rational choices, the more we can get back to addressing our many overlooked needs. Instead of stumbling into disappointment after disappointment, we can do much more to dynamically engage each other’s specific needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Need-response</strong> counters normalized alienation of impersonal rules with mutual respect for one another’s engaged needs. <strong>Need-response </strong>provides <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/need-response/wellness-campaign"><strong>tools</strong></a><strong> </strong>lacking in all of the other professions for fully resolving our needs. In the process, <strong>need-response</strong> holds the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/f04-authority-principle"><strong>powerful accountable to the results of their influence</strong></a> upon our vulnerable needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more you allow <strong>need-response</strong> to fully resolve our needs, the more we can all function individually and collectively. The more <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c08-general-principle"><strong>needs we resolve, the more problems clear up</strong></a>. The more we resolve our needs, the more of our potential we can reach. The more we respect each other’s needs, the more we can spread around much needed love.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3">Responding to <em>your </em>needs</h3>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">Certainly there are aspects of needs beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Could this apply to philosophy and other areas currently regarded as mostly subjective?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">How could need-response answer the decline in trust in our institutions?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">I can see room for abuse by bad faith actors insisting their subjectivity has some objective core.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

A01 Foundational Principle

A natural need is an objective fact.

The more you drill down to the beginning of an experienced need, the more you find what exists prior to any human intervention. You don’t merely believe you must have water or that you need a friend, you experience these needs as essential to your capacity to function. Your ability to function after quenching a thirst or leaning on a friend exist independent of subjective feelings, as objective facts. The less your natural needs resolve, the less you can objectively function.

<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center"><strong>Which do you think is more likely?</strong></p>
<p class="font_7"><br></p>
<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center">All political and adjudicated conflicts are best resolved by whoever provides the best argument.</p>
<p class="font_7"><br></p>
<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_7"><br></p>
<p class="font_7" style="text-align: center">All political and adjudicated conflicts are best resolved by resolving each side’s priority of needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Not only do your natural needs for water and for companionship exist as objective needs, you objectively need some things more than other things in order to fully function. You prioritize those things necessary for you to objectively function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Independent of your subjective experience, you require water one moment and to relieve yourself in another moment. You objectively cannot function if you try to choose not to drink water when thirsty. You objectively cannot function when ignoring your need to relieve yourself.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Independent of your subjective experience, you require companionship in one moment and to be left alone in another moment. You objectively cannot function if you fail to deeply connect with someone who deeply cares about you. You objectively cannot function if you ignore doing more things for yourself for when no one is around.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Your need to draw in water and expel waste water is cyclic. Your need to draw closer to others and then pull away sometimes is also cyclic. You can easily relate how your objective priorities can change with the seasons.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You experience other priorities of needs that rarely change with the seasons. Your situation can prioritize one set of needs over another. You may find it difficult to relate to others with a sharply different priority of needs. Especially if falsely assuming they choose to need differently.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">When living in less densely populated areas, you objectively prioritize providing more for yourself without relying too much on public institutions. You gravitate toward conservative values. Conservatism gives outward expression for your inward priority of self-sufficiency that you did not choose. You objectively require less government intrusion to fully function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">When residing in more densely populated areas, you objectively prioritize utilizing public institutions more and more. You gravitate toward liberal or even progressive values. Liberalism or progressivism gives you outward expression of your inward priority for social support that you did not choose. You objectively require more government involvement to fully function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy instills the discipline that objective priorities shape our political and judicial preferences more than strong arguments. We’re naturally attracted to political or judicial arguments that most align with our objective priorities. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c04-general-principle"><strong>We don’t choose our needs; our needs choose us</strong></a>. We best choose to respect each other’s objective priorities of needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Need-response</strong> challenges the popular yet failing assumption that our political and judicial conflicts are best settle by might. The prevailing argument favoring one side easily ignores the objective priority of needs of the other side. And that sets up the context for the next politicized or adjudicated confrontation.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Current standards assume we resolve conflicts with the best argument. This conveniently ignores how the side with the most resources tends to sound more persuasive, often getting their way. Moreover, the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e02-conflict-principle"><strong>squashed needs</strong></a> of the losing side easily comes back to haunt the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/f04-authority-principle"><strong>coerced settlement</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Denouncing <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e05-conflict-principle"><strong>violence</strong></a>without addressing the unmet needs fueling that violence tends to fuel more violence. Outwardly, it may appear a politicized or adjudicated issue was settled. Then we wonder why the losing side cannot remain content with the results of our democratic process.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Objective needs and objective priorities do not submit to majority vote. Expecting our institutions to change the inflexible reality of each other’s priorities now collapses public trust in those institutions. They can never deliver what many expect if clinging to this notion that the priorities of others can be changed to fit our own priorities. That’s simple a recipe for more violence, visible or invisible.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Need-response</strong> raises the bar by first identifying the inflexible needs and inflexible priorities on each side of a conflict. While combative politics and the adversarial judicial process takes the easier win-lose path, need-response can create better outcomes with its win-win approach.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead of coercing the public to accept one priority of impersonal laws over another to ease pain, <strong>need-response</strong> helps each side to remove cause for pain by resolving needs each priority of needs more fully. Instead of coercing the plaintiff and defendant to accept one side’s priority &nbsp;over the other, <strong>need-response</strong> guides each side to melt the conflict and heal any damage with the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/h03-love-principle"><strong>higher power of love</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Need-response</strong> brings all sides together to illuminate their inflexible priority of needs. Then incentivizes all sides to find the best way to resolve the inflexible needs by adjusting their flexible side of how they address each other’s needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Distinguishing between inflexible needs or inflexible priorities and any flexible response to them can be critical to resolving politicized and adjudicated conflicts. The fact our political and judicial institutions overlook this critical distinguish is a key reason why they are failing. The further these institutions pull us away from loving one another, the less reason to trust them to produce good outcomes.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead of privileging animosity and hate, let’s get back to loving one another. Instead of spurring antagonism and even hate by trying to manipulate others to serve your own priority at the expense of their inflexible priority, <strong>need-response</strong> dares you to honor their inflexible priority as you would have them honor your inflexible priority.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Such <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/h03-love-principle"><strong>love</strong></a>sets our higher moral standard and we must not back down, lest our objective levels of functioning is allowed to decay further. <strong>Need-response</strong> brings the discipline to honestly engage each other. To identify the inflexible needs on all sides. To stop provoking either side’s animosity toward the other, but instead nurture greater respect for each other’s less visible affected needs and priorities. That’s how targeted institutions can earn the empirically based legitimacy to impact our lives.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Any person or institution resisting this higher <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/h06-love-principle"><strong>standard of love</strong></a> risks being marked as pariah. Once marked, they can be held personally and professionally responsible for our rising rates of anxiety, depression, addictions, and suicides. Not to cast them aside but to enforce the <em>tough love</em> that we mean business when avowing to fully resolve needs. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/h01-love-principle"><strong>Love</strong></a><strong> </strong>permits us to do no less.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">How can need-response effectively transform politics and the courts?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">People are too self-centered for this high-minded approach.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">How is this love different from romantic love and other kinds of love?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">How can I distinguish between what’s inflexible and what’s flexible in my own priorities?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

A02 Foundational Principle

A naturally prioritized need is an objective fact.

The more something you require to fully function persists unsatisfied, the more your attention will be drawn toward its satisfaction. It matters less whether you believe you must prioritize it. The objective basis of your functioning subconsciously demands you focus on it over less pressing matters. Any subjective beliefs or feelings arrive after the objective fact of your life prioritizing it. The less you attend to your inflexibly prioritized needs, the less you can objectively function.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Your ability to function has little to nothing to do with your needs.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Your ability to function has everything to do with your needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">This unique understanding of your needs recognizes that your every need relates to your ability to function. The less your needs resolve, the less you can function. The more your needs resolve, the better you can function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy identifies <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/4-levels-and-nuance-of-the-functionality-array"><strong>four key levels of your ability to function</strong></a>.</p>
<ol class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Peakfunction</strong>: When you prioritize to promptly and fully resolve your needs. You reach more of your full potential. You enjoy sustainable wellness.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Symfunction</strong>: When you prioritize pragmatically easing your needs with help from others. You can sufficiently function. Just not at your best.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Dysfunction</strong>: When you prioritize relieving the pain of your many unresolved needs. You can hardly function. You typically cope with something addictive.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Misfunction</strong>: When you prioritize survival from too many unresolved basic needs. You barely hang onto life. You find yourself repeatedly at death’s door.</p></li>
</ol>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">A need can be appreciated as a kind of metaphor for function. The more your need for water is satisfied, the better you can function. The less your body’s requirement for water can be satiated, the less you can function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">If you cannot satisfy your thirst, you will find yourself obsessing for something to drink. While you experience these subjectively, they begin from the objective reality for your life’s requirement for something to function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">This applies equally to your emotional needs. If you cannot satisfy your longing to be understood and appreciated by those closest to you, you will find yourself obsessing to be accepted. You must receive some social connection to function, or you will remain in the pain of loneliness.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">This new profession of need-response applies this central anankelogy principle. It can either complement or compete with other service institutions.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Need-response can complement the psychological focus of psychotherapy by adding the essential dimension of responding to the needs that the mind processes. Need respond can complement law enforcement and the judicial process, and even politics. Or it can compete with these institutions by creating better results when addressing the needs for which they ostensibly exist.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">These service institutions of law and psychotherapy tend to follow the popular norm of relieving pain over addressing the needs prompting such pain. The more a court battle or ballot contest offers mere relief for the pain of publicly affected needs, the less we can function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">We tend to accept such relief is the best we can get. We accommodate to lower levels of being able to function. We cope with the increasingly pain of these unmet needs. We also get angrier and angrier at each other.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">The more inspired to endure the discomfort of working through the painful portion of fully addressing our needs, the more we can fully resolve them. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/d04-pain-principle"><strong>Pain is not the problem as much as the threat such pain exists to report</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The further you can remove the threat prompting the pain, the better you can function. Once your functioning gets restored, the more capable of removing other threats. The less vulnerable to coping habits like addictions. And the more your anger can shift toward grace, peace and love.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2">Responding to <em>your </em>needs</h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum" rel="noopener" target="_blank"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">How can this apply equally to a physical need and an emotional need like the need for love?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">How long do I have to put up with the pain before I can enjoy restored functioning?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Isn’t short-term pain relief okay, or is the only path toward better functioning is costly pain?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">If I’m already trapped in addictive patterns, how can this insight help me climb out of them?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B01 Basic Principle

All needs exist to serve function.

The more you resolve your needs, the better you can function. The more you eat well, the better you can function. You eat, breathe, connect with friends and enjoy moments of solitude all for the sake of being able to function through life. The less your needs resolve, or the less you attend to your prioritized needs, the less you can function. Where there is no function to serve, there is no need.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Since emotions are highly subjective, they must be controlled with reason.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">The sooner you resolve a need, the sooner its emotion naturally goes away.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Your emotions convey to your body whatever your life requires to function in that moment. If your ability to maintain function requires you to do something, such emotions compel you to act.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The further your underlying needs remains unresolved, the more intense the emotion. The urgency to safeguard your capacity to function, to exist, could provoke you to react in some way. Such an alarming reaction often creates other painful needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Each emotion conveys a specific need. Each addresses a particular area of your ability to function. And each comes packed with your sense’s perceived intensity of that need.</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Anger</strong> conveys to you that you’re facing something you cannot accept. The more you perceive it as unacceptable, the more intense the anger. From mild irritation to violent outrage.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Fear</strong> conveys that you’re facing something you sense you cannot adequately handle. The more you perceive it as beyond your ability to handle, the more intense the fear. From mild anxiety to overwhelming terror.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Guilt</strong> conveys your self-serving actions unacceptably contrast with your social commitments. The more your behavior violated social norms, the more intense the guilt. From mild embarrassment to devastating shame.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Disappointment</strong> conveys that your rightful expectations have not been met. The more dependent upon what fell through, the more intense your disappointment. From casually resigned to the outcome to full disruption to your life.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Depression</strong> conveys, in large part, a drop in energy to continue pursuing commitments at odds with your other neglected needs. The greater the contrast between your habitual neglect of these other needs, the more serious the depression. From a mild case of gloominess to major depression.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">In each case, your emotion conveys something lacking in your ability to fully function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You may not even be aware of such emotions. The more aware of your emotion, the more you feel it. You could be experiencing one emotion while feeling another.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">For example, you say you feel upset when your colleague failed to show up for a one-on-one meeting you drove across town just to attend. Before emoted that this is something you cannot accept, your body likely emoted disappointment.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You may feel too angry to be aware of your emotion of disappointment. Prior to emoting disappointment, your body likely emoted shock, at that moment when you were trying to be sure your colleague was there or not.</p>
<p class="font_8">The greater the impact on your ability to function, the more intense the emotion.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Wisdom warns us not to react to our emotions. Need-response addresses irritants that needlessly provoke your more intense emotions.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Need-response addresses the needs conveyed by your emotions, instead of trying to ease your painful feelings. That’s a basic fault of our failing institutions. If they do not respond to the needs your emotions report, you tend to get stuck in those painful feelings.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more you can resolve the needs your emotions convey, the less pain you must endure. Simple enough, but not easy. Need-response offers tools to reconnect us all to the needs our emotions exist to convey.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Doctors and lawyers mean well by offering you options to relieve your pain. But if you ever become dependent on such pain-relieving options, you risk missing the point. The very point of your pain is to alert you to something you must do, or not do, to continue functioning.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more you slide down the rabbit hole of pain-relief or suppression, the fewer of your needs can fully resolve. You end up in more pain. Then you seek more ways to relieve that pain. This creates a vicious downward spiral, debilitating your life.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Short-term pain relief may prove necessary to restore your focus. But let your tolerance for discomfort build up enough to never become dependent on pain-relieving options. Long-term relief from uncomfortable emotions risk trapping you in more pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Need-response offers tools to cultivate and improve your relationship with your own emotions. You learn to appreciate the pain you likely prefer to avoid. You also learn to reflect on desires before indulging them too soon. You grow the capacity to process your feelings to promptly resolve your needs, to remove cause for pain or for obsessive cravings, to restore you to holistic wellness.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">All emotions compel attention to unresolved needs. To get you to do something so you can keep on functioning. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/d01-pain-principle"><strong>Without a need to convey directly or vicariously, you experience no emotion</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">I know I shouldn’t act on every emotion right away, but that’s not exactly suppression.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Sometimes I must curb my emotion’s intensity before I do something stupid.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Too often, it’s next to impossible to fully resolve a need and I feel stuck feeling bad.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What kind of tool could help me improve how I relate to my own emotions?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B02 Basic Principle

Emotions personally convey needs.

The less you can function because of some lack or some threat, the more your body will emote you do something to replenish that lack or remove that threat. Such responses are automatic. Your body conveys your needs to maintain function. You don’t even have to feel it, though you often do on some level. Where there is no need to convey, there is no emotion.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">You only feel like you must prioritize something because you’re basically an irrational being.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Your life includes a built-in mechanism to ensure your existence before all else.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Your emotions typically convey the intensity and urgency of a need. If experiencing mild anxiety, for example, you can usually focus on other things. But if paralyzed by panic from a deadly threat which is about to hit you, you can hardly think about anything other than what you must do to survive.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">This could also occur in mild incidents. For example, you can be generous to others to a point. But if giving everything away to the point you have nothing left to live upon, your emotions will kick in to warnof this threat to your survival. Whether mild depression or encroaching anxiety, your life prioritizes your capacity to continue existing.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You can feel happy in one moment and then abruptly feel frightened when threatened. That fear prioritizes your attention to handle whatever now threatens your continuance. This spans from ensuring you do not get killed in that moment to avoiding any later risk of harm that could eventually limit your ability to fully function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Need-response counters the limits of impersonal law that often overlooks actual threats to wellbeing. Impersonal legal systems tend to neglects the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/a01-foundational-principle"><strong>objective reality of the unchosen needs</strong></a> of all impacted by a conflict.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more ignored, the more adversarial legal systems tend to prioritize one party’s needs over the other. Both in a court battle and at the ballot. The winner in a legal battle cannot be assured their needs resolve. Political or judicial victories do not always lead to better lives.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Usually, the victory only provides some relief from the pain of their negatively impacted needs. Only by ensuring a path for all sides in a conflict can resolve their <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/a02-foundational-principle"><strong>objectively prioritized needs</strong></a> can a sustainable solution be achieved for lasting peace.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">The more we rely on adversarial legal systems, like the adversarial judicial system and polarizing politics, the more we tend to overlook this prioritizing force of self-continuance. No law can curb a person’s prioritized self-continuance when threatened.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Legal systems <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/f02-authority-principle"><strong>suffer from a lack of legitimacy</strong></a> when trying to impose its will to coerce suppression of an unchosen need for continued existence. No one chooses to require security, or safety from violence, or avoidance of overwhelming pain from damage. Provoking such needs in the name of authority, especially if evoking reactions it seeks to put down, reflects poorly on its legitimacy.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more our adversarial legal systems neglect the forceful prioritization of existence, either on a personal or collective level, the more the forces of nature will overrule the forces of human authority. Resorting to violence to put down violence easily risks more violence.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">What such blind authority <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e10-conflict-principle"><strong>reactively resists they tend to reinforce</strong></a>, getting more of what they claim to seek to reduce. <em>Familiarity bias</em> tends to normalize the resulting cycle of violence, often displacing more responsive alternatives.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Need-response goes to the core of a conflict by addressing each <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/a01-foundational-principle"><strong>unchosen need</strong></a> and each <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/a02-foundational-principle"><strong>unchosen priority</strong></a><strong> </strong>presented in that conflict. These are kept distinct from <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-dcbm3"><strong>chosen responses</strong></a> to such needs.</p>
<p class="font_8">To effectively address the clashing responses to each other’s unchosen needs, need-response applies some familiar qualities it calls <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness"><strong>character refunctions</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-ei270375446"><strong>Grace</strong></a>: Invite all parties in a conflict to humbly admit their imperfections, to then reach them where they honestly at in their struggle to address their prioritized needs with questionable actions.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-34f4e379465"><strong>Empathy</strong></a>: Encourage each side in a conflict to see the experience through the eyes of the other, to relate more directly to the affected unchosen needs of the opposing side or sides.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-fx7q915397"><strong>Humility</strong></a>: Welcome each side to drop any pretense that they know best what should be done, to allow room to learn how each one’s ability to function is honestly impacted by the conflict.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-wz4rg375488"><strong>Mercy</strong></a>: Incentivize each side to let go of any right to retribution to make room to repair any damage and restore mutual respect for each other’s unchosen needs.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-v3gzh377947"><strong>Discipline</strong></a>: See that each delays any immediate gratification of their anger so they can prioritize mutual respect that can in the long term assure less provocation of prioritized self-continuance.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-2uctl13360"><strong>Gratitude</strong></a>: Inspire each side to appreciate the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-w82r9379451"><strong>generosity</strong></a>from the other side when they show deference to their affected unchosen needs.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-ic16m377974"><strong>Resilience</strong></a>: Hold each side accountable to enduring the challenging difficulties as long as humanly possible to optimize the opportunity to support each other’s prioritized continuance.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">There are many more of these that can help resolve a conflict. And curb the extremes that can erupt when urgently seeking one’s own survival, or reduction from the risk of harm. Need-response can tailorize each one of these to apply to a specific conflict you find yourself in.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">In the heated moment of prioritizing self-existence, these qualities can quickly go by the wayside. Need-response can turn a challenging conflict into an opportunity for mutual support with these aptly applied qualities. To <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/h03-love-principle"><strong>prioritize the power of love over coercive laws</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Whenever someone’s prioritizing self-continuance gets provoked, need-response offers better tools than <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/g03-law-principle"><strong>adversarial legal systems</strong></a> to ensure each other’s affected needs can resolve. Then to remove the cause for pain that often provokes conflicts. In the process, the improves each other’s level of functioning to ensure they can prioritize mutual support from that point forward.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">In the heat of the moment, who can do anything but defend oneself?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What about the rationalizations we use when feeling threatened by some foe?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Poor judgment lets some folks feel like their survival is threatened when it actually is not.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">How does need-response specifically provide these responses to a conflict I am in?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B03 Basic Principle

Your emotions prioritize your existence.

The more you sense some threat, even a mild risk to your safety, your emotions will automatically prioritize your continued existence. Without your assured continuance, little else matters to your life. Or you may no longer be around, or at least at your current capacity, for anything else to matter. Once triggered, it’s next to impossible to prioritize anything else.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">You address your needs by rationally thinking through each one.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">You address routine needs with the autopilot of your healthy feelings.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Every feeling you feel comes with its own level of intensity. The more your need-conveying emotions sense your ability to function is held back, the more intense the emotion. As your ability to function goes back to your functional norm, the feeling naturally subsides. Let’s use some common needs to illustrate the ups and downs of emotions.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Self-determination</strong>. Consider your need to define your own path in life. If right now you can freely pursue your own purpose in life, you likely do not feel any urgency to do your own thing if already doing it. But the more your ability to function requires a level of self-determination you find elusive, the more intense the longing for self-determination.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Fairness</strong>. Consider your need to be treated by the same standard as anyone else. If you don’t feel cheated right now, you likely do not feel life is unfair. But as soon as you feel you are being treated more negatively than others, your emotions warn you with growing intensity.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Acceptance</strong>. Consider your need to be affirmed for who you authentically are. If you’re totally embraced for who you honestly are, you may not even feel the need for acceptance. But as soon as you feel a threat of rejection, your longing for acceptance can naturally intensify.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Grieving</strong>. Consider your need to adjust to some painful loss. If you have not suffered any terrible loss recently, you likely feel no urgency to make any emotional adjustments. But if you recently lost something of great importance to you, you will intensely feel</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Intimacy</strong>. Consider your need for affectionate closeness. If already close to someone in a satisfying relationship, you don’t exactly long for intimacy at that moment. But if unable to find a compatible romantic partner, you may be craving for intimacy.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Security</strong>. Consider your need to remain unhindered by dangers. If feeling totally safe at the moment, you likely don’t even think about your need for security. But as soon as dangers come rushing in, your need for security rushes front and center.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Support</strong>. Consider your need to receive help where you cannot provide for yourself. If surrounded by friends pouring out bountiful care, you don’t feel the need for support that intensely. But if in trouble somewhere all by yourself, you yearn for all the help you can get.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">With each of these, the more your feelings warn you that you must resolve the need as soon as possible, it often includes something that could hold hope of prompt relief. Often, this serves as stopgap measure, at least until the real thing comes along.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Unfortunately, we can become attached to such substitutes. Until a need fully resolves, your mind keeps you focused on it at some level. The less you can resolve a need on your own, and especially if vulnerable to forces beyond your personal control, you could find yourself trapped in emotional pain warning of persisting unmet needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Need-response identifies <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/4-levels-of-human-problems"><strong>four levels of human problems</strong></a> that can leave you feeling stuck in emotionalpain.</p>
<ol class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Personal problem</strong>. You can solve a personal problem on your own. The painful feelings subside soon after you pursue your solution.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Interpersonal problem</strong>. You solve an interpersonal problem with cooperation with a peer. The closer you agree on a solution, the sooner your painful feelings can fade away.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Power problem</strong>. You must wait on someone of influence to solve the problem. If they respond to your need, your painful feelings can then stop bothering you.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Structural problem</strong>. A social norm or structural pattern must change before you can solve such a problem. Until then, you could feel trapped in some intensifying emotional pain.</p></li>
</ol>
<p class="font_8">Need-response exists to address each level of problem. The more your problem sits higher above this list, the more likely you endure some sharp disturbing feelings. Long-term endurance of such emotional pain correlates with coping mechanisms like addictions.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Too many of us must find ways to accommodate increasingly loads of emotional pain from mounting loads of unresolved needs, due to these complex problems. Need-response prepares you to address all of these levels of problems so that all sides can benefit by resolving more needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Hyper-individualism presents a major hurdle to identifying the level of a problem prompting your intense emotions. The Western bias toward personal responsibility—which is laudable when properly applied—easily blinds us from these higher levels of human problems. We too easily blame ourselves for what we cannot personally change.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead of entertaining the complexities of our problems, we cope with <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-14a3p"><strong>relief-generalizing</strong></a><strong> </strong>that avoids dealing with the problem. Instead of engaging the intense feelings that follow, we gloss over the details that could solve the problem. Instead of solving problems, we feed the deeper nefarious problem of <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-c1aik"><strong>avoidant adversarialism</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">We avoid facing the uncomfortable reality of our complicated problems by becoming adversarial. Since it’s easier to change a powerless individual than change the more powerful person or institution, we habitually evade the intense feelings produced by such problems by rushing into conflicts. To avoid dealing squarely with complicated issues, we <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-eimbi"><strong>indulgently take sides</strong></a> in these contrived conflicts.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">In short, we try to <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/d08-pain-principle"><strong>take the easier path but that quickly becomes the harder path</strong></a> the bear. Your <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/d04-pain-principle"><strong>intense feelings are not the problem as much as the unresolved needs they exist to report</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Need-response has you embrace each challenging feeling. You develop the tenacity to embrace even your most painful emotions. You get to the need each of these intense feelings try to report.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You then address each problem up the ladder. You resolve your personal problems the best you can. But offered understanding that even your personal problems may require some attention to these higher-level problems.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Even those in positions of influential power have many of the same needs as you. So need-response cultivates mutual supports. That includes offering them many of the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness"><strong>same qualities that you need</strong></a>. For example, you offer them <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-ei270375446"><strong>grace</strong></a><strong> </strong>that affirms where they are developmentally at to model the standard for how they are to graciously affirm you where you are at.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You learn to let your painful <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c02-general-principle"><strong>feelings serve you, so you don’t feel trapped serving them</strong></a>. You learn to turn your most intense feelings into opportunities for growth. You learn to appreciate these intense feelings as they inform you the status of your many needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">When overwhelmed with intense pain, what do you have to help me to think straight?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">This seems easier said then done, so I’d like to see such pain endurance in action.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Personal responsibility <em>is</em>the answer for most problems, or so I am personally convinced.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What can be done about lingering pain that doesn’t seem connected to any current need?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B04 Basic Principle

Your feelings alert you to the status of your needs.

The more your functioning becomes limited from some unresolved need, the more your feelings call attention to it. Initially, such feelings remain vague. Then often out of the blue, they turn alarmingly urgent. Usually with something you could do right away to ease the pressure. You could react on this feeling. Or you could dig deeper into what your feelings can only suggest is really happening. Properly responding dissolves its intensity.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">You hold all of your beliefs as equally important.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">The more vital a belief to your life, the more you cling to it.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">If something has no relevance to anything you require to function, you will hardly consider it important enough to form defensible opinions about it. But if something proves highly significant to your ability to function, you will inevitably form defensible views around it.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">For example, if a winter pond appears covered in ice, it matters little to you if that ice is thick enough to walk across. But if you must traverse across it, your belief in how thick it must be now becomes very important to you.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Likewise, if you’re relying on government assistance to help you pay this month’s rent, your beliefs about the necessity of government supports will be much more hardened than the remotely rural farmer able to provide everything the family needs. That farmer can easily dismiss government assistance as a waste of tax dollars, but not you.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">As your <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/b02-basic-principle"><strong>emotions personally convey your needs</strong></a>, your beliefs convey how to interpret and respond to such evoked needs. The more intensely felt the need, the typically more hardened the beliefs. You hold true what you rely upon to help ease your needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">If you cannot rely on something or others to fully resolve a need, you likely find something to rely upon to ease that need. Or some belief to depend upon to relieve the pain of that unmeet need. The more you count on a belief to help cope with mounting pain, the more difficult to adjust that belief—even if grossly inaccurate. False beliefs abound when struggling with pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Need-response aims to improve each other’s responsiveness to each other’s needs. Instead of trying to shape how we think about such needs (as in psychotherapy) or how to impersonally monitor behaviors (as with the law), need-response realizes that your thoughts and behavior easily take care of themselves the better we can all function from resolving more of our needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Needs come first. Beliefs then follow to serve those needs. Such beliefs then serve as a filter for interpreting the recurrence of that such needs. The less accurate belief, the more likely you will suffer the pain of unresolved needs. Need-response gets to the source of the problem by addressing the needs themselves.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Too much focus on faulty beliefs or errant thinking, or even problematic behavior, risks overlooking how we all affect each other’s needs. As modern society increases alienation from each other, we privilege being less responsive to each other’s sensitive needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Increasingly, we form beliefs that normalize such alienation. We expect others to reason their way to respect what we expect of them. Instead of personally asking what we need of each other, or asking what we can do for others, we vainly hope the impersonal law will cover all the bases. But our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/g03-law-principle"><strong>laws do not resolve needs; people do</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Need-response inspires us to improve our beliefs not through better thinking or law-conforming behavior but by responding better to each other’s needs. Letting our needs resolve more fully naturally enables us to think better and behave more respectfully toward others.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Need-response extends beyond problem-focused psychiatric disorders or criminal behaviors. It gets to the root of such problems by addressing the underlying yet overlooked needs erupting as disorders and illicit behaviors.</p>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy advantages the <strong>need-responder</strong>’s toolbox with a unique set of tools currently lacking in psychotherapy and law enforcement. These tools identify overlooked factors that lower your ability to function, and then adds what can restore your ability to function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">These are called <strong>defunctions</strong> and <strong>refunctions</strong>respectively.</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">A debilitating <em><strong>defunction</strong></em> lowers your ability to function. You feel pain as your body warns you that you can no longer function as before.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">A liberating <em><strong>refunction</strong></em> raises or restores your ability to function. Once restored to wellness, you feel the pleasure of being able to do more.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead of “believing” in something, you’re invited to relate. To engage the information. To vulnerably apply what fits your life, and help create the objective results of resolved needs.</p>
<p class="font_8">Here are some examples of debilitating <strong>defunctions</strong> corrected by liberating <strong>refunctions</strong> to sharpen beliefs to better serve needs.</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><em><strong>Discomfort avoidance</strong></em> by <em><strong>discomfort embrace</strong></em>. Believing you should evade any level of pain, which <u>attracts more pain</u>, can be replaced by learning to relate to pain as a natural warning system to remove threats.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><em><strong>Normative alienation</strong></em> by <em><strong>dynamic engaging</strong></em>. Believing we should remain painfully isolated from each other, such as in the name of privacy, can be replaced by getting to know what we specifically require from each other.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><em><strong>Psychosocial imbalance</strong></em> by <em><strong>psychosocial balance</strong></em>. Believing we must champion one priority of needs over another, fueling political polarization, can be replaced by addressing all needs in due <u>season</u>.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><em><strong>Grudges</strong></em> by <em><strong>forgiveness</strong></em>. Holding onto the comforting belief of vindictiveness, which fuels more than solves a problem, can be replaced by letting go of the anger to rebuild any broken trust.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><em><strong>Perfectionism</strong></em> by <em><strong>grace</strong></em>. The belief one is never quite good enough can be replaced by appreciating where one is developmentally at and affirming the good faith to improve from there.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><em><strong>Arrogance</strong></em> by <em><strong>humility</strong></em>. Believing one is rightly better advantaged than others can be replaced by making it easier for everyone to admit their shortcomings.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><em><strong>Dismissiveness </strong></em>by <em><strong>empathy</strong></em>. Believing it’s okay to disregard others can be replaced by trying to see their experience through their perspective, to realize the merit in their words.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Each of these pairings nurture your beliefs to better serve your needs while respecting the needs of others. No need to get bogged down in psychology or legalism. Instead, you realize as you’re able to resolve more needs that you can remove more cause for pain. You can then free up your thinking. And can more freely honor the needs of others. And they can then do likewise toward you and your needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">How can I trust that these are not just another set of questionable beliefs?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">This seems dismissive of believing in psychology and law, which are very helpful.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">How does the concept of a “defunction” improve upon psychiatric disorders?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Forgiveness and grace should remain in the domain of religion and not a social science.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B05 Basic Principle

Beliefs exist to serve needs.

The more your interpreted perceptions help you to function in life, the more they crystallize into useful beliefs. The less relevant a fact is to your functioning, the less you cling to it. It matters little if you agree or disagree whether the sun will someday go nova. You can hardly be persuaded against holding as true what helps you survive today, or helps you get by, or helps you get ahead in life.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">You can change at will any of your beliefs at any time.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">You cannot easily change a belief you rely upon to serve your vital needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Your mind holds true or untrue what it finds useful to serve your needs. The more impact, imagined or real, the more you cling to a belief as an unassailable conviction. The less relevant to your needs, the less you hold onto a belief.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">If a comet passes by the earth a million miles away, it matters little if you believe it could hit the earth the next time it passes by in the next century. But if headed directly toward us, now your belief of a likely impact matters everything to you.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The less information you find about something likely to impact your needs, the more you tend to generalize to fill the gaps. The less your needs resolve, the more drawn to comforting generalizations to help you get by.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more your beliefs rely on comforting generalizations that are easily disconfirmed by specifics, the less reliable your beliefs. Generalizations drift from reality, which hinders you from resolving needs. Specifics enable you relate more accurately with reality, to resolve more needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more your beliefs get shaped by what only eases your needs or relieves your pain of unmet needs, the more easily you overlook reality. You become saddled with blind spots or false urgencies to ease the mounting pain. You then rely more on generalizations to avoid specific pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more you rely on comforting generalizations, the less your needs can fully resolve. The less your needs resolve, the more emotional or physical pain you will suffer. The more pain you suffer, the more drawn to comforting generalizations for some kind of relief. Rince and repeat.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Need-response shifts attention away from the quality of your thinking to the quality of how well we treat each other. You can be one of the best critical thinkers on the planet, and still clutch for rationalizations when desperately seeking relief from neglected needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more responsive to each other’s needs, the less drawn to false beliefs. You believe what you find enables you to resolve more needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The less responsive to each other’s needs, the more drawn to false beliefs. You believe what you find helps you cope with the pain of your unmet needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">We all cling tightly to <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/b08-basic-principle"><strong>beliefs full of errors</strong></a>. The less your needs resolve, the more errant your beliefs. The more your needs resolve, the more your beliefs reflect what is real.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Most of our institutions assume you arrive to your beliefs rationally. Our adversarial institutions of law privilege less responsiveness to each other’s needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">No law requires you to be gracious toward other’s imperfect efforts, or to be empathetic to the poorly understood, or to be patient with those struggling to get it right. These <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness"><strong>qualities</strong></a><strong> </strong>fall outside of the legitimate role for law.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Laws prioritize harm reduction over need resolution. It goes <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/g04-law-principle"><strong>against the grain of law to fully resolve needs</strong></a>. After all, our behaviors are not literally <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/g02-law-principle"><strong>governed by our laws but by our needs</strong></a>. The more we vainly count on our impersonal laws to fix our problems, the more we often believe what we must think is true to cope with the pain of our resulting unaddressed needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">As modern society loses traditional sources for cohesion, such as a communal faith or a civic community, we easily put more and more faith in our impersonal legal systems. We call the police. We sue others. We overlook the shortcomings of the adversarial judicial system and limitations of divisive politics to somehow fix our problems. We believe these are important to fix matters because we need them to be important to fix matters.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Need-response seeks to restore interpersonal respect for each other’s needs. To directly relate to each other’s needs instead of relying blindly on laws to compel each other’s respect. To turn from a culture of outrage to a culture of mutual respect.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more need-response can inspire you to believe in the importance of personally expressing your need to others, the more you can believe that laws serve more as a backup system than the plan A we vainly expect them to be.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">One way we can better identify and address our needs is to agree to apply what anankelogy calls <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-ei270375446">character refunctions</a>. These are ethical standards known throughout history to create better results than mere legalistic norms alone.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">For example, these five <em>character refunctions</em> can help renew relationships constrained by some wrongdoing.</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-ei270375446" target="_self"><strong>Grace</strong></a>. The more you meet others where they're at, the less you're pulled into conflict.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-lg0ap375461" target="_self"><strong>Forgiveness</strong></a>. The more you get past your anger, the less others bring up your faults.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-qoshl375474" target="_self"><strong>Atonement</strong></a>. The more you can restore some loss you caused, the more you melt their bitterness.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-wz4rg375488" target="_self"><strong>Mercy</strong></a>. The more you can suffer loss, the more you inspire others to get past their losses.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-cwbga375501" target="_self"><strong>Justice</strong></a>. The more responsive to their needs, the more they can be fairly responsive to your needs.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more you believe what you find actually resolves needs, removes pain and restores wellness, the more you actually resolve needs, remove pain and restore wellness. You need to believe what improves your life, and let go of believing whatever helped you cope with past pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">I choose to believe many of my beliefs, even if nothing in my life requires me to think it true.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">There must be more to what shapes our perception of what is so than simply our needs.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Surely there is some agency, some personal responsibility, in how we shape our beliefs.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Is this belief that <em>we believe what we need to believe</em> stem from something we need to believe?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B06 Basic Principle

You believe what you need to believe.

The more a belief proves vital to your existence, the more it rises in your hierarchy of accepted truths. The more your life seems or actually depends on something being so, the more you must naturally defend it. The less relevant to your required means to function, the less you defend it. The less your needs resolve, the more tightly you cling to any belief you perceive helping you get by.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Any bias is purely rational and only requires better thinking to stay impartial.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Bias primarily exists to compel your attention to preserve your ability to function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy defines bias generally as having to prioritize something in order to function. Your unchosen needs compel your attention to do something about them. The less resolved one of these natural needs, the more compelled to give it your full attention.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy refers to this as your focal cycle.</p>
<ol class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Nonfocal phase</strong>. What your life requires remains out of awareness while fully satisfied. E.g., You feel no thirst when your body fluid levels remain at optimal levels.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Prefocal phase</strong>. Something your life requires starts to emerge as a necessity. E.g., You start to feel mildly thirsty but could wait a while before doing anything about it.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Focal phase</strong>. Something your life requires takes center stage of your awareness. E.g., You must only think about getting something to drink to quench your thirst.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Defocal phase</strong>. As you satisfy what your life requires, it drops out of your awareness. E.g., With your thirst satisfied, you can think more about other things.</p></li>
</ol>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">A budding priority turns into a lingering priority if you cannot satisfy the need. Your unresolved need cannot shift to defocal or onto a nonfocal phase. Instead, it remains burningin your consciousness as it demands you do something about it. If not the need itself, then do something about the resulting pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The objective priority of your objective needs risk turning into a subjective priority of a subjective response, to get some kind of relief. The more you find relief without resolving the needs, the more your beliefs become distorted. For example, the less you can resolve your need for friendship and experience a norm of social media “friends” as the best you can get, the more you may develop a biasthat prioritizes these shallow relationships as the best you can get.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy recognizes how <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c06-general-principle"><strong>all natural needs sit equal before nature</strong></a>. Only our desperate experiences prioritize them in our biases. Need-response aims to prioritize promptly resolving needs to remove cause for cognitive-distorting pain, and to quickly restore wellness.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Modern institutions tend to normalize the fact our needs often do not promptly resolve. Many of our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-73t7k"><strong>exposed needs</strong></a> cannot promptly resolve, at least not fully, because of factors beyond our personal control. Need-response “responds” to these with <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-14a3p"><strong>responsivism</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><em><strong>Responsivism</strong></em> is the belief and practice that we can promptly resolve our own needs the more we promptly respond to the needs of others. The more I respond to your personal need for security as you require it, for example, the easier for you to respond to my need for security in the unique way that I may require it.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">This cuts against the norms of <em>adversarial institutions</em>, with their cookie cutter norms. Need-response counters as a <em>mutuality institution</em> that incentivizes us to personally relate to our distinct needs and preferred responses to them. By prioritizing mutual responsiveness to others instead of prioritizing mutual opposition, more needs can be promptly resolved. And less room given to distorting biases that easily tear us apart.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Bias compels you to focus more on something than another. The more your life insists you focus more on some underserved need, the less aware you tend to be of other less urgent needs. While struggling to get by, you easily overlook the urgent needs of others. Especially if their priority seems to run contrary to your prioritizing urgent needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">If you rely on government assistance to compensate for economic disadvantages beyond your control, for example, you find little if any space in your mind to think about those who experience government as more intrusive than you. You can hardly empathize with others while in pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Such bias can distort your awareness. You can hardly think about what someone else needs if your own needs require you to prioritize your attention toward some king of relief. You can even find yourself rationalizing some pragmatic way to ease your most painfully pressing needs, even if violating your ethical principles. Even if violent towards others.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">A little bit of partiality naturally exists when compelled to attend to some pressing need. It becomes a problem when cut off from awareness of other less urgent needs. Especially when you must obsess about your own painfully shouting needs at the expense of realizing the needs of others you negatively affect.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Let’s now get right to how this principle can solve that problem. . For now, this serves as placeholder text. When I find the time, I will post the full deal here.One way <em><strong>responsivism</strong></em> prioritizes our biases to promptly resolve needs is by applying <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness"><strong>character refunctions</strong></a>, such as empathy and humility.</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Empathy</strong>. The less you appreciate the perspective of others, the more your biases distort your thinking away from promptly resolving needs, and more toward coping with the resulting pain. The more you see through the eyes of others to appreciate more of reality, the more your needs can promptly resolve.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Humility</strong>. The more you arrogantly ignore your shortcomings, the more your bias of overconfidence can distort your thinking to repeatedly ignore this source of your own pain. The freer you can acknowledge your imperfections, the more your needs can promptly resolve.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Gratitude</strong>. The less grateful for what others do for you, the more your biases distort your thinking to assume you arrived where you’re at completely or mostly on your own. The more you show your appreciation for others, the more your needs can promptly resolve.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Justice</strong>. The more you expect others to respond to your needs while ignoring theirs, the more such a bias distorts your thinking to perpetuate the pain inherent in conflicts. The more <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e09-conflict-principle"><strong>the higher standard you apply is fairly measured back to you</strong></a>, the more each other’s needs can promptly resolve.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Endurance</strong>. The longer you ignore the threats your pain exists to warn you about, the more you tend to bias relief over removing such cause for pain. The longer you can tolerate the unpleasant experience of your body warning you of a threat, the more attentive you can be to fully remove that threat.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">In addition to such <em>character refunctions</em>, <em><strong>responsivism</strong></em>utilizes other types of <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-14a3p"><strong>refunctions</strong></a>. For example, the <em>refunction</em> of <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-14a3p"><strong>relational knowing</strong></a> can correct the distorting bias of thinking exclusively in black-and-white terms.</p>
<p class="font_8">You learn to appreciate the range of possibilities of how two or more things relate to each other. The more you learn to relate along a spectrum, for example, the less your biases pull into thinking errors that trap you in pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Notice how each character trait above associates with resolving needs. The <em>more</em> of this, then the <em>more</em> of that. Or <em>less</em> of that. This can check for such things as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias"><strong>confirmation bias</strong></a>and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semmelweis_reflex#Authority_bias"><strong>authority bias</strong></a> where conditions incentivize ignoring <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=disconfirming+evidence&amp;sca_esv=30c375223fbe6df1&amp;sca_upv=1&amp;sxsrf=ACQVn09Q-XcaqgAr7jmnzrVd9GmHE4HB6A%3A1712280392386&amp;source=hp&amp;ei=SFMPZpbrE6Hf0PEP5ZWOkAQ&amp;iflsig=ANes7DEAAAAAZg9hWGdYyFh8OpY1SZwK9FijPEhnFOZw&amp;ved=0ahUKEwiWr6nE9amFAxWhLzQIHeWKA0IQ4dUDCBg&amp;uact=5&amp;oq=disconfirming+evidence&amp;gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhZkaXNjb25maXJtaW5nIGV2aWRlbmNlSABQAFgAcAB4AJABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBA8gBAPgBApgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHAA&amp;sclient=gws-wiz"><strong>disconfirming evidence</strong></a> while normalizing the resulting pain and diminished levels of functioning.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Rather than seeking to improve our thinking or shape our behavior with conformity to laws, need-response holds us accountable to empirically measurable levels of wellness. By holding authority or any of us accountable to the objective level of functioning, we become less vulnerable to the painful problems of distorting biases.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Most of all, need-response champions the organic point of bias to prioritize resolving needs as soon as possible. And to acknowledge how natural it can be for distorting biases to set in, when we must cope with the resulting pain of not being able to resolve needs. Instead of going down the rabbit hole of rationalized reasoning behind our biases, need-response goes to the source by focusing on the bias-driving needs themselves.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">How can I know if my bias prioritizes my attention toward resolution or toward mere relief?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What if responding to the needs is not enough and we must attend to our thinking errors?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What about “defunctions” that point to the problem of prioritizing relief over reality?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What are some other types of refunctions that can help check the problem of biases?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B07 Basic Principle

Your biases prioritize your needs.

The less resolve a need, the more your attention naturally turns to seek its relief. You find you must prioritize whatever you find available to ease the emotional pressure. Sometimes, you hit on exactly what your life requires. Your prioritized thinking leads you in a positive direction. Other times, you prioritize generalizations that offer hope for relief. Such biases easily lead you astray, and in pain.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Most of your beliefs are accurate and serve you well.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Most of your beliefs are faulty and often serve you poorly.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy recognizes the limits of our ability to know what is exactly true or untrue, or what is partially true. Three broad principles cover the accuracy of what we assume to know as true.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>1. All beliefs include some level of</strong> <strong>error</strong>.</p>
<p class="font_8">It is always impossible to know everything about any topic, so there are bound to be some inaccuracies in what you hold true or untrue about something. You cannot possibly be aware of new facts being created as you rely on previous facts to hold true. For example, you trust you will be prepared for an upcoming phone screening job interview but cannot know that the interviewer is about to reschedule the call.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>2. Most of these errors are insignificant and harmless</strong>.</p>
<p class="font_8">While it’s impossible to know everything about something, you generally prioritize knowing the mostimportant stuff to relative accuracy. You’re free to be wrong about matters that don’t impact you or cause you to negatively impact others. For example, you believe your neighbor took a summer trip by jet plane for a vacation in Canada, but it matters little to your life that they actually drove there by car.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>3. Some errors are very significant and lead us into trouble</strong>.</p>
<p class="font_8">It’s possible that some of your beliefs, when acted upon, can cause serious harm. Not only to yourself, but also to others. For example, if you incorrectly believe your spouse is cheating on you and you confront them with an angry tirade of accusations, you risk destroying your marriage over nothing. Misinterpreting their denials as a coverup drags you down further into destructive falsehoods. Too many of us are already there.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Whatever you hold as true or not true works best when kept flexible with fresh inputs. You don’t know what you don’t know. And once you get defensive, vainly trying to avoid feeling hurt, you risk shutting out the very information your life requires to lift you out of all the pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Powerholders tend to be limited by the fact that they don’t know what they don’t know. If they don’t know what they don’t know and overconfident they know enough, they are less inclined to seek this unknown. They risk remaining ignorant of vital information.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">What we believe about each other tends to be full of errors. Many of our assumptions can be distorted by exaggerations. Modern society tends to keep us alienated from each other. Rural folks hold may errant beliefs about urban folks as urban folks poorly understand rural folks.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The less accurate the beliefs we act upon, the less we can resolve our needs, And then we find ourselves in more pain. To avoid further pain, we avoid each other further. The many public problems facing us tend to point to this shift from harmless errors to harmful errors in our beliefs about each other. Alienation appears to be slowly killing us.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">More and more of our beliefs slip into harming others and ourselves because of the widely overlooked problem of <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-c1aik"><strong>avoidant adversarialism</strong></a>. That’s where we <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-eimbi"><strong>indulgently take sides</strong></a> to evade possible pain instead of taking a stand to resolve the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-2np8e"><strong>unchosen needs</strong></a> on all sides that could remove cause for pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">We magnify our problems and pain the more we <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e02-conflict-principle"><strong>oppose each other</strong></a>. We get <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e11-conflict-principle"><strong>mutually defensive</strong></a> and rationalize this as <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e04-conflict-principle"><strong>debating</strong></a>. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e03-conflict-principle" target="_self"><strong>A rush to debate usually skips the details in life that really matter</strong></a>. We squabble over less relevant matters. To vainly avoid pain, we lock ourselves in more pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more we get mutually defensive, the more we tightly cling to faulty assumptions about each other. Here are two examples of such harmful beliefs damaging many lives: 1) the overlooked prevalence of <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/responsive-exoneration-tutorial"><strong>wrongly convicting the innocent</strong></a> and 2) the overlooked differences in <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/a02-foundational-principle"><strong>organic priority of needs</strong></a> behind our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/let-s-unpack-politics"><strong>political differences</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>1. Wrongly convicted innocent</strong>.</p>
<p class="font_8">The adversarial judicial system incentivizes <strong>confirmation bias</strong> and <strong>tunnel vision</strong> among law enforcement. Which leads to misidentifying the innocent as the culprit, and to relying on junk science that rationalizes the belief that the innocent person did the crime, among other harmful errors. These are often dismissed by appellate panels as “harmless errors” that get caught by innocence projects exposing the innocent on death row. The adversarialism baked into the system increases the risk of slipping into many overlooked harmful beliefs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>2. Provoked political polarization</strong>.</p>
<p class="font_8">The adversarial political system pits one group’s <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-2np8e"><strong>unchosen priority of needs</strong></a><strong> </strong>against another group’s <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/a02-foundational-principle"><strong>unchosen priority of needs</strong></a>. Conventional thinking assumes each side must debate each other to get respect for their needs. You are expected to agree or disagree with each other, without first affirming the unchosen needs. That needlessly keeps us apart. Instead of getting to know the specific needs of others, we generalize that they could somehow change their needs to fit our own preferences. But that never works.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">There are many more public problems magnified by our errant beliefs. There are many things we get wrong the more we are avoidant and adversarial to the point of rejecting reality. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c09-general-principle"><strong>The more you reject reality, the more reality rejects you</strong></a>. The less you integrate reality into your life, the less you can resolve needs. And the more <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/3-stages-of-slipping-into-symfunction-capture"><strong>trapped in pain you become</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Need-response cautions against relying too much on conventional modes for correcting beliefs. Expecting impersonal education or coercive laws to produce more accurate understandings easily sets us up for disappointment.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Instead, need-response gets to the core of most faulty beliefs, and this is unresolved needs that distort our thinking. The more we continually engage reality to resolve each other’s needs, the more our beliefs naturally sharpen.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Responsivism methodically replaces a <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-8f7vp"><strong>defunction</strong></a><strong> </strong>that provokes faulty beliefs with a <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-14a3p"><strong>refunction</strong></a><strong> </strong>that improves the accuracy of our beliefs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">For example, <strong>arrogance</strong> is recognized for how it can easily trap you into clinging to false assumptions. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/20-character-refunctions-restoring-wellness#viewer-fx7q915397"><strong>Humility</strong></a><strong> </strong>opens you to discovering new information and engaging relevant yet overlooked facts.</p>
<p class="font_8">The defunction of <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-8f7vp"><strong>discomfort avoidance</strong></a> gets you to defend your beliefs from criticism, locking you into painful fictions<strong>. </strong><a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-8f7vp"><strong>Discomfort embrace</strong></a> lets you remain open to correction to sharpen your beliefs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Need-response identifies these defunctions and corrective refunctions in the such problems as the wrongly convicted innocent and political polarization. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/need-response/wellness-campaign/responsive-exoneration"><strong>Responsive exoneration</strong></a> and <strong>responsive depolarization</strong> can improve the accuracy of our beliefs simply by instilling more love in our lives for each other.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></p>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">Reasoning should improve our beliefs if it doesn’t slip into rationalizations.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">How can we know when a harmless belief slips into the danger zone of becoming harmful?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Can a belief be harmful to one person or group and harmless to another?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Whose to say which beliefs are full of inaccuracies when we all have our biases?</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B08 Basic Principle

All beliefs include error.

The more you generalize, the less likely the accuracy of those beliefs. If irrelevant to your life, then the result errors can pass unnoticed. As a factory worker, it matters little if I believe Abraham Lincoln was born in Illinois or Kentucky. If my livelihood depends on it, I better know he was born in Kentucky. There will always be facts beyond the reach of your conclusions. Humility helps you stay informed.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">All your behaviors result from rationally chosen decisions you make.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">All your behaviors ensure you continue to function and minimize pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Everything you do aligns with your continuing existence. Otherwise you would cease to exist. Or would not exist well.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">If you jump off a high cliff to certain death, you won’t be serving your needs anymore. Everything you do aligns with what your life requires to continue. You eat to continue existing. You avoid harmful accidents to continue existing. You seek necessary help from others to continue existing.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">All your behaviors relate to what will help you continue functioning. You don’t even have to think about it. Your feelings tap into the memory of your experiences for how to ease each familiar need. Newer needs create new emotionally charged memories.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Your beliefs inform your feelings on how you experience each need. Your behaviors attempting to ease your needs shape your beliefs, as you note what helps or doesn’t help to ease your discomfort. For example, as you get defensive in an argument (behavior) to feeling threatened (belief), you unlikely empathize with the affected unchosen needs of those with whom you disagree.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more you feel threatened, the more you feel you must act to protect yourself from harm or from pain. Any of your actions at odds with your wellbeing will likely result in pain. &nbsp;All your actions go along with what you believe is good for your wellbeing.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Need-response appreciates how your wellbeing can be no better than your behaviors serving your needs. If everything you require to function remains consistently accessible, you will do fine. Most of us are not that fortunate.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">We all must act to ease our needs when resources are not readily available. Fair enough when what is needed soon becomes available. Unfortunately, we all too often become accustomed to situations where we cannot fully resolve our needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">We develop behaviors that help us get by. We behave the best we can with what is at hand. We often form bad habits. We cope with the pain of our declining capacity to function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">The less you can access the means to resolve your needs, the more drawn to alternatives that can at least ease the discomfort. If too busy to sit down for a healthy meal, for example, you settle for some processed food. Or you feel accepted by social media “friends” for something you posted when you cannot find someone to talk to in person.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">When such alternatives seem elusive, you likely opt for something that only eases the pain. You settle for a substitute that cannot resolve your need. For example, when you try to satisfy your hunger with junk food. Or you talk endlessly to yourself when desperate for conversation and feeling no one will listen to you.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Such experiences normalize your behavior away from fully resolving your needs. You get used to the idea of coping with the pain. Your addictive routines become so familiar that you cannot imagine your life without them. The less you can fully function because the fewer of your needs resolve, the more you react to the steady flow of pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">Need-response incentivizes greater responsiveness to each other’s needs. Alienation gets replaced by engagement. Mutual defensiveness by mutual supports. Outrage by understanding.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">We address the elephant in the room, which is <strong>avoidant adversarialism</strong>. We shift from the norms of avoiding the discomforts of vulnerably relating to each other to a new norm of engaging each other’s unchosen needs. We shift from the norms of adversarially trying to win over others to a new norm of mutuality that affirms each other’s unchosen needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Much of the ills plaguing society can be stripped down to this problem of <em>avoidant adversarialism</em>. We now accept as normal how isolated we’ve become from each other. Need-response cuts through this alienation to forge new connections with the power of love.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more we can regrow our social connections, the easier to connect generosity with neediness. The better we can serve each other’s needs, the more our own needs can resolve. The more our needs can fully resolve, the more our behaviors will naturally take care of themselves. That’s how powerful love can truly be.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">What about rude behaviors, destructive behaviors, sadistic behaviors, even violent behaviors?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What role can and does the law play in guiding our need-shaping behaviors?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">What if I violated someone’s presumed privacy to ask them what they specifically need of me?</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">Sometimes not behaving as expected can be a problem, such as a sin of omission.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B09 Basic Principle

All your behaviors serve your needs.

The less some action contributes to your wellbeing, the more open you are to change them. The more an action enables you to function, the more likely to repeat that action. Even the most trivial of behaviors must align with what you need to function, or you will likely change it. If you keep giving cash to that homeless guy and then run out of cash, you inevitably change your behavior.

<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">Which do you think is more likely?</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">The way you experience a need in childhood is pretty much the same as you experience it now.</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">OR</p>
<p class="font_8" style="text-align: center">The way you experience a need can change drastically as the means to resolve it changes.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Anankelogy</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Every natural need compels you to do something to ensure you can continue to function. Your needs either resolve or you cannot function as well. The lower your capacity to function, the more pain as your body warns of the threat.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You either fully resolve a need or partially resolve a need or merely ease the pain of a need or suffer the mounting pain of a need.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<ol class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">The more you can fully resolve your needs, the closer you can reach <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-380l0"><strong>peakfunction</strong></a>.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">The more you partially ease your needs, the more you linger in <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-css6a"><strong>symfunction</strong></a>.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">The more you cope with pain of unresolved needs, the deeper you’re stifled in <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-8f7vp"><strong>dysfunction</strong></a>.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">The more you suffer too many unresolved needs, the further you slip into <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-d8lb2"><strong>misfunction</strong></a>.</p></li>
</ol>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Some of your needs can fully resolve. The more you can access nutritious food and clean water, the healthier you can be.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Some of your needs only partially resolve. The more you must settle for shallow friends, the more you feel tolerably isolated.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Some of your needs can only be placated by pain coping mechanisms. The more repeated trauma weighs you down, the less you can function.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Sometimes you cannot do anything about a painful need. The longer you must suffer a critical need, the closer you fall into danger of long-term damage or death.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The more you adjust how you address such needs, the more your experience of such needs can change. They typically evolve to adjust to your real-life situations. And to accommodate your real-life limitations.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Consider how technology changes the way you experience your needs. Your recent ancestors had to wash all of their clothes by hand, and make time to prepare and cook food over a hot stove. They performed many difficult chores for each other. They also tended to enjoy greater family cohesion than you likely do now. Consider how <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/d09-pain-principle" target="_self"><strong>a life full of comfort is a life not fully lived</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Need-response</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy cites the pattern of rising and falling ideologies that shape how we resolve many of our needs.</p>
<ol class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Dynamic phase</strong>. We discover a fresh way to address old problems. We resolve our needs in a dynamic new way. New ideas are welcomed.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Dogmatic phase</strong>. We settle on this new normal. We routinize this recently revised approach. We start to resist new ideas a threat to our new establishment.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Disillusion phase</strong>. We grow increasingly discontent with its shortcomings. We see it doesn’t fit some of our needs. We start seeking alternatives.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8"><strong>Distinction phase</strong>. We give up on most if not all of it. We either go back to previous ways or look for something new. Some of us even denounce the “new way”.</p></li>
</ol>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">New ideas often get watered down to appeal to as many as possible. Contentious specifics get dropped to favor generalizations we all or most can agree upon. But overgeneralized answers overlook many specific situations, leaving many needs underserved. Discontent of the old plants seeds of something new, something else to later provoke our disgust.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Our needs evolve when there are sufficient resources accessible. To ensure such access, ideas often pop up as a “critical version” that remains aware of its limitations. For example, capitalism promises to incentivize production, but cannot promise its produced resources to everyone. Socialism promises to give access where needed, but cannot promise a robust supply.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The earlier carefully thought-out version tends to morph into later popularly generalized version, or ‘popgen’ for short. We find it easier to react to the pain instead of responding to our needs to remove cause for pain. We generalize for relief, trapping ourselves in pain.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Our experience of needs then evolves. Sometimes we develop improved ways to resolve them. Too often, we regress into reacting to the pain of our unresolved needs. We change in less healthy ways as our capacity to function declines. Then prioritize relief, sinking into dysfunction.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Reactive Problem</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8">We “solved” many of our old problems with too much generalizing. We threw out the proverbial baby with the bathwater. In the process, we frequently created new problems.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">No, we don’t resolve our needs in the same way anymore. Sadly, we partially resolve far more of our needs than fully resolve them. Perhaps that is how it’s always been. We often trade one problem for another, stretching our capacities to comprehend and solve them. Modernity merely changes what kind of problems we suffer.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">The rise of science dispelled the prevalence of superstition. Then the decline of religion came with the loss of our monocultural community. The rise of technology allows us to be more productive than ever. And to remain more disconnected than ever.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Anankelogy has a word for our routine of staying disconnected from each other: <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-aqh1d"><strong>normative alienation</strong></a>. We now rely on impersonal rules and public policies to attend to our needs in ways they never can. <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/g05-law-principle"><strong>Laws themselves</strong></a> can never <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/g05-law-principle"><strong>address our specific needs</strong></a>. You have to go <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/g04-law-principle"><strong>against the grain of law to fully resolve your needs</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h3 class="font_3"><strong>Responsive Solution</strong></h3>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Responsivism</strong> replaces <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-aqh1d"><strong>normative alienation</strong></a> with <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-8f7vp"><strong>dynamic engaging</strong></a> to resolve more needs. And replaces <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-c1aik"><strong>avoidant adversarialism</strong></a> with <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/post/glossary#viewer-73t7k"><strong>engaging mutuality</strong></a>. to resolve more needs. The <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c08-general-principle"><strong>more needs we resolve, the more problems we solve</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">Political activism may inspire desirable policy changes, but usually falls tragically short of addressing the needs on all sides. Policy changes that serves the needs of some at the cost of respecting the needs of others naturally sets up the next political conflict.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Responsivism</strong> replaces this objectification of each other with a more mutually engaging climate. You recognize the <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/c06-general-principle"><strong>needs of others are as important as your own needs</strong></a>. You encourage more love and less outrage or hate.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8">You recognize <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e10-conflict-principle"><strong>what you reactively resist you ultimately reinforce</strong></a>, as <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/principles-1/e02-conflict-principle"><strong>opposition to their unchosen need provokes their defenses</strong></a>. Just as their blind opposition provokes your defensiveness. Responsivism replaces this futile exercise with mutual respect for each other’s unchosen needs.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><strong>Responsivism</strong> encourages us to resolve needs fully and promptly without hindering others from fully and promptly resolving their needs. We turn from provoking conflicts to encouraging better understanding of each other’s needs. Along the way, we learn to love a lot more.</p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<p class="font_8"><br></p>
<h2 class="font_2"><strong>Responding to </strong><em><strong>your</strong></em><strong> needs</strong></h2>
<p class="font_8">How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our <a href="https://www.anankelogyfoundation.org/forum"><strong>Engagement forum</strong></a> your thoughtful response to one of these:</p>
<ul class="font_8">
  <li><p class="font_8">Certainly some needs, like breathing oxygen, never changes.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">I doubt if there ever was a time when someone could fully resolve all of their needs.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">I can imagine a scenario of regressive changes redirected by improved opportunities.</p></li>
  <li><p class="font_8">It seems we can manage alright with less needs resolving as long as we can avoid the pain.</p></li>
</ul>
<p class="font_8">Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below.</p>

B10 Basic Principle

Needs resolve and evolve.

The more you satisfy a recurring need, like drinking water to quench a thirst, the more your repeated action predictably leaves you satisfied. The more you pacify your recurring needs with some alternative, like indulging in junk food for each meal, the less your hunger subsides. The more you habitually rely on alternatives, the more your life contracts to accommodate such limits.

A-Foundational
B-Basic
C-General
D-Pain
E-Conflict
F-Authority
G-Law
H-Love
bottom of page