.png)
Introducing Need-Response: a refreshing alternative to our failing institutions
Solving our general problems by resolving our specific needs
Together, we can build a more responsive alternative.
How? Join the conversation each Wednesday morning to learn how you can help shape this new service.
We will need to start small, with a narrow focus
Need-response will first serve the wrongly convicted innocent who are disillusioned with the adversarial legal process. More specifically, need-response can help the wrongly convicted innocent disillusioned by the innocence movement to publicly establish their innocence outside the biased adversarial legal process.
We invite those underserved by innocence litigators to use our Estimated Innocence Form. By comparing an innocence claim with those already exonerated, it automatically calculates the viability of that claim. We then take this further with Responsive Innocence.
Join us as we create a viable alternative to the adversarial legal process. Not to defy the law but to fulfill the purpose of law: respecting each other's needs. We aim to boldly resolve needs overlooked by the law. Let us learn together what works and what needs adjusting. Let's creating something that could make legalistic adversarialism obsolete.
Need-Response
Applied anankelogy creates the new professional field of need-response. It directly responds to needs to support each other's wellness.
Need-response improves wellness with two approaches: 1) individually with a wellness initiative, and with 2) a crowdsourced wellness campaign.
You start simply enough with a tool that puts your inflexible needs over flexible laws, as an act of proactive social love.
Need-response entry services
Need-response starts simply enough with the Fit-Law tool. You can then opt to take this wellness journey further with the Exaction Invoice service.
Need-response starts with me
The founder of anankelogy and need-response, Steph Turner, serves as the first guinea pig to test this new series of services. Steph continues to endure the consequences of a wrongful conviction in 1993, after coming out as trans and convicted primarily upon the belief that LGBTQ+ are child recruiting sex predators. Steph positions need-response to solve such a problem in ways the adversarial legal process continues to fail to fix.
Will this
new thing
work?
Recently, Steph faced wage garnishment from an unjust tuition bill that resulted from the wrongful conviction. Steph inaugurates need-response to challenge this latest injustice. Instead of trusting the adversarial legal process to correct this problem—which caused the problem in the first place—Steph is using the mutuality alternative of need-response to solve this problem. Follow development of Steph's experiences on the Need-Response podcast.
You can help shape this pioneering service
We'll not annoy you with requests to support us on Patreon. We get right to the point. By supporting this podcast, you help us build a better future for yourself. Start for free and see for yourself if this isn't what you've been yearning for.
3 Engagement Tiers
1. Follower - FREE: Orientation
Familiarize yourself to the potential of this new service.
2. Supporter - $5/month: Engagement
Engage us to shape this into something for your needs.
3. Patron - $25/month: Participation
Help create this new service and potential for income.
